Why some parents give their child bare bottom spanking for punishment? - bare bottom spanking
Why naked? to think its terrible, and the return of a child, I am ashamed!
What do you think?
Monday, January 18, 2010
Bare Bottom Spanking Why Some Parents Give Their Child Bare Bottom Spanking For Punishment?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
The family is the bare bottom no secret. Experience has here, the father of a better control effects, and the blows should be shorter, because it is more efficient. And do not know if it blows ass naked and others, should be at what level the child.
The shame of a child must be the need to be punished by beatings, not to the naked buttocks. You can test this by providing two strokes with the same force, one naked and one rear with clothes. If the level is high, more tears.
I almost always spanking bare bottom. I remember as a child, bare ass spanking causes a much greater impression.
In addition, the immediate point of a spanking is a legitimate reason ouch crush - in layers of clothing is a little cons-productive.
It is also unfair and ridiculous that the effects of the beatings, which depends on the baby clothes that is just - as a child, I knew that I can remember, and in a particular pair of corduroy, I thought that hitting could be in sight - which seems the SWAT dark - lol
I believe not to believe in ideas that is unacceptable and demeaning. Fine is demeaning in nature. I do not think a child shows his brief return to be disciplined by his mother (who has bathed and changed their diapers) is very humiliating.
It was for good reasons, the traditional form of spanking - it works. It was also the first attack against the defenders nospanking - and a way to get his nose in the tent and to promote their ultimate goal of the ban on smacking in general.
Well, it's a right way and a wrong way to beating them up, like many other things, television, sweets - physical discipline itself is not bad or wrong. It is, as it is the tool that uses it good or bad. A bare ass spanking goes a little too far in my personal opinion, but someone could use it properly - do not know. I just know - if someone angry when hitting with the fist or go or leave marks - on board, and it is a mistake. Proper use includes self Spanking by parents and use it to teach a child something important. There is something in anger, and clamor to be made. Then he became violent. Spanking is not something done for every minor violation, either. I think it should be a last resort, to be absolutely the deliberate disobedience. A person must also consider the age of a child. Most children will not understand a spanking until about 2 years and is very humiliating and bad for use when a child OldeR - depending on the child, somewhere 8 to 10, I think. I rely mostly on the magic of 1,2,3, and the age and time outs, natural consequences as much as possible when they put them in danger, of course. Well, the whole question of security of supply bare ass is sure is painful, but only if a parent does not leave marks - well - it really depends on the parents. Spanking Shoudn't be used for both. Parents must have a culture of education - not just the mind. Well, they do not teach in appropriate class of these things. Or say that all spanking is bad, or you have to let so much and make them spoiled children. Once I was a nanny for some of the control children and parents would not allow the discipline of any kind - no 1,2,3 - no waiting - and wondering why not the 6 years was able to control themselves in school and was into all sorts of problems. Now, all parents are responsible for their children to learn discipline. But not everything is discipline in the juiceNot as bad as physical abuse and can also have negative consequences for life.
A Spanking should not be the first option. Save a punishment for repeated violations and / or more serious crimes in order to improve the effectiveness of the blows. Low pants or lifting skirt / dress to enhance the spanking. Reduce your underwear and lows in Bared to impress the girls of the extreme seriousness of the misconduct. Older children - especially adolescents - absolutely not suffer lost forever. The release of funds for a spanking is the greatest misfortune and should serve to better deterrence of wrongdoing. After a methodical and logical progression of the severity of the spanking can work wonders.
The reason why some parents choose for their children to spank in the back is bare, to repair the damage of sentences. You try to retrieve the child uncomfortable for them and not care about children and what they learn. It's revenge.
I agree with spanking. I really do. But I think it should be restricted in the hands of parents and is always perfectly dressed in a.
The purpose of a whip is not to punish the bad behavior of his doctrine true from the false. He must be taught right from wrong. First Teach your child what is right and what is wrong and if they break the rules, to punish them. The reason is the proposition to give them something to help them, remember to respect the rules already in place to be. Thus, some of SWAT with the hand is drawn on the back enough. It hurts and I remember when they think again about the rules and barriers.
There is no need to punish more unpleasant than it has to be.
Post a Comment